In Stage II to III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), optimizing curative intent starts with selecting an appropriate treatment approach for your patient1

For Stage IIA (N0-N1), Stage IIB (N0-N2), Stage IIIA (N0-N2), or Stage IIIB (N2)

Surgery-based approach1,2*

Medically operable and resectable disease

All patients enrolled in Phase III, label-enabling trials had up-front resectable disease3-7

See the latest guidelines

*For patients with Stage IIA (N0-N1), Stage IIB (N0-N2), Stage IIIA (N0-N2), or Stage IIIB (N2) disease, surgery is an option as part of a multimodal approach with neoadjuvant immunotherapy + CT, perioperative immunotherapy + neoadjuvant CT, or adjuvant immunotherapy or adjuvant therapies.1,2

+/- Neoadjuvant treatment

Surgery

+/- Adjuvant treatment

There should be a high probability of complete resection (R0) before initiation of a neoadjuvant approach. Neoadjuvant therapy to induce resectability is an unproven approach1†

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for NSCLC V.7.2026

 
See the latest guidance

High probability refers to the expectation that an R0 resection is feasible and achievable, as incomplete (R1/R2) resection is associated with poor outcomes.2

For unresectable Stage III disease

Chemoradiotherapy-based approach1,2‡

Medically inoperable or unresectable disease

See the latest guidelines

For inoperable patients with unresectable Stage III disease, concurrent CRT followed by consolidation immunotherapy (or targeted therapy in the presence of certain mutations) is an option.1,2

Chemoradiotherapy

Consolidation treatment

MDT evaluation should be performed prior to treatment and should include a thoracic surgeon and a radiation oncologist who have major parts of their practices dedicated to thoracic oncology1

NCCN Guidelines® for NSCLC V.7.2026

 
See MDT guidance

In Stage II to III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), optimizing curative intent starts with selecting an appropriate treatment approach for your patient1

For Stage IIA (N0-N1), Stage IIB (N0-N2), Stage IIIA (N0-N2), or Stage IIIB (N2)

Surgery-based approach1,2*

Medically operable and resectable disease

+/- Neoadjuvant treatment

Surgery

+/- Adjuvant treatment

All patients enrolled in Phase III, label-enabling trials had up-front resectable disease3-7

See the latest guidelines

*For patients with Stage IIA (N0-N1), Stage IIB (N0-N2), Stage IIIA (N0-N2), or Stage IIIB (N2) disease, surgery is an option as part of a multimodal approach with neoadjuvant immunotherapy + CT, perioperative immunotherapy + neoadjuvant CT, or adjuvant immunotherapy or adjuvant therapies.1,2

There should be a high probability of complete resection (R0) before initiation of a neoadjuvant approach. Neoadjuvant therapy to induce resectability is an unproven approach1†

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for NSCLC V.7.2026

 
See the latest guidance

High probability refers to the expectation that an R0 resection is feasible and achievable, as incomplete (R1/R2) resection is associated with poor outcomes.

For unresectable Stage III disease

Chemoradiotherapy-based approach1,2‡

Medically inoperable or unresectable disease

Chemoradiotherapy

Consolidation treatment

See the latest guidelines

For inoperable patients with unresectable Stage III disease, concurrent CRT followed by consolidation immunotherapy (or targeted therapy in the presence of certain mutations) is an option.1,2

MDT evaluation should be performed prior to treatment and should include a thoracic surgeon and a radiation oncologist who have major parts of their practices dedicated to thoracic oncology1

NCCN Guidelines® for NSCLC V.7.2026

 
See MDT guidance

KEY POINTS

KEY POINTS

How can curative intent treatment be optimized in Stage II to III NSCLC?

  • Optimizing curative intent starts with selecting an appropriate treatment approach for your patient1
  • There are established pathways to curative intent, depending on medical operability and resectability: The surgery-based approach and the chemoradiotherapy-based approach1,2
  • Early assessment by the full multidisciplinary team is critical for identifying an appropriate curative intent approach for each patient1

CRT=chemoradiotherapy; CT=chemotherapy; MDT=multidisciplinary team; NCCN=National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®).

References: 1. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer V.7.2026. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2026. All rights reserved. Accessed August 7, 2026. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way. 2. Kim SS, Cooke DT, Kidane B, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons expert consensus on the multidisciplinary management and resectability of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2025;119(1):16-33. 3. Cascone T, Awad MM, Spicer JD, et al. Perioperative nivolumab in resectable lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(19):1756-1769. 4. Lu S, Zhang W, Wu L, et al. Perioperative toripalimab plus chemotherapy for patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer: the Neotorch randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331(3):201-211. 5. Heymach JV, Harpole D, Mitsudomi T, et al. Perioperative durvalumab for resectable non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(18):1672-1684. 6. Wakelee H, Liberman M, Kato T, et al. Perioperative pembrolizumab for early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(6):491-503. 7. Forde PM, Spicer J, Lu S, et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy in resectable lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(21):1973-1985.